What a shame to hear the news that Sarah Palin won't run for president in the 2012 elections. She is a strong lady, and would certainly fit as the first female president of the United States. I fully understand her decision, and claiming her family as the primary reason, only underlines the point I am trying to make.
Politics need more women, and Sarah Palin IS a person whom we all admire and like. She says exactly what she thinks. Even though some have criticized her for her alliance with the Tea Party organization, she is the strong hand needed to reestablish the finances of the United States.
It is a sad day for politics, and the old boy network will enjoy the chance to run for candidacy now that she isn't running. I hope she changes her mind and runs in 2016. She is the woman America needs in the White House.
Thursday, October 6, 2011
Saturday, August 13, 2011
Danish Government Forbids Muslim Dinner in Parliament
The most shocking news released today indicates that the Danish government has cancelled a dinner with muslims. Xenofobia full speed, and I am ashamed that our Prime Minister is such a sissy. A wimp who has for far too long tolerated the Danish People's Party (which has only very little real backing, but purely a populist coincidence with xenofobia as primary drive).
Integrating people together involves a smile. That is the first step of a friendship. Hosting a dinner could work miracles in creating RESPECT and FRIENDSHIP between people, and that is apparently unwanted in Denmark, as long as the Danish People's Party is the deciding factor for Lars Løkke Rasmussen to remain in power.
I have NEVER before felt so ashamed that our public building should be such an exclusivist club that a small party can stop an interpersonal meeting just because some people apparently have so little sense as to realize the stupidity in all of this.
I refrain from saying more on this issue...
Integrating people together involves a smile. That is the first step of a friendship. Hosting a dinner could work miracles in creating RESPECT and FRIENDSHIP between people, and that is apparently unwanted in Denmark, as long as the Danish People's Party is the deciding factor for Lars Løkke Rasmussen to remain in power.
I have NEVER before felt so ashamed that our public building should be such an exclusivist club that a small party can stop an interpersonal meeting just because some people apparently have so little sense as to realize the stupidity in all of this.
I refrain from saying more on this issue...
Saturday, August 6, 2011
The SP Downgrade of US Credit Rating
First of all, the S&P downgrade of US credit rating is only from AAA to AA+ - still a good credit rating, and one that is way above that of many other nations. But the S&P credit rating SHOULD awaken politicians to some very important truths.
The US government is taking in TOO LITTLE in tax income. It is only fair that people (and companies) who earn money PAY the bill. Everyone wants to enjoy the blessings of public service, and consequently paying the bill SHOULD be at the forefront of all governors, senators as well as governmental bodies.
When some states (e.g. Delaware) offer VERY LOW taxes, those taxes are used for speculative purposes. Establishing offshore companies where European companies create holding companies with hometown in a low percentage state is pure speculation. Not a single job is created by such speculation, and therefore there seems to be little reason to offer these bargain taxes. If there is ANY reason whatsoever, please add your comment. I would gladly hear from those who could explain the reason for wanting such holding companies to center their businesses without any job gains as far as I can see... :-)
One important element is that companies SHOULD pay taxes in the country where the money is earned. Equally applicable for all company sizes - small and big.
Likewise, it seems clear for all that you can't save money as a way to gain positive results. You need to get a proper state income for a nation to finance its way through the economic challenges ahead. It may not be popular to raise taxes, but given the fact that some high salary earners run speculative scams also, there might be a good reason to review tax laws - and this principle applies to many countries.
If I may include a principle from the world of religion, I will claim that the Ten Commandments are simple to remember - yet applicable to virtually all aspects of living. Why couldn't tax laws be just as simple?
It would bring in lots of tax money once the principle is understood, and that should be possible for Democrats and Republicans alike...
The US government is taking in TOO LITTLE in tax income. It is only fair that people (and companies) who earn money PAY the bill. Everyone wants to enjoy the blessings of public service, and consequently paying the bill SHOULD be at the forefront of all governors, senators as well as governmental bodies.
When some states (e.g. Delaware) offer VERY LOW taxes, those taxes are used for speculative purposes. Establishing offshore companies where European companies create holding companies with hometown in a low percentage state is pure speculation. Not a single job is created by such speculation, and therefore there seems to be little reason to offer these bargain taxes. If there is ANY reason whatsoever, please add your comment. I would gladly hear from those who could explain the reason for wanting such holding companies to center their businesses without any job gains as far as I can see... :-)
One important element is that companies SHOULD pay taxes in the country where the money is earned. Equally applicable for all company sizes - small and big.
Likewise, it seems clear for all that you can't save money as a way to gain positive results. You need to get a proper state income for a nation to finance its way through the economic challenges ahead. It may not be popular to raise taxes, but given the fact that some high salary earners run speculative scams also, there might be a good reason to review tax laws - and this principle applies to many countries.
If I may include a principle from the world of religion, I will claim that the Ten Commandments are simple to remember - yet applicable to virtually all aspects of living. Why couldn't tax laws be just as simple?
It would bring in lots of tax money once the principle is understood, and that should be possible for Democrats and Republicans alike...
Sunday, July 3, 2011
War on Terrorism - The Backside of the Coin
War on terrorism is an absolute necessity, but there is also a backside of the coin. Notice how many countries are either silent or adamantly opposed to ruling out terrorism from both their own ranks and countries close to themselves.
If everyone agreed terrorism was wrong, there would be no opposition.
But there is opposition, and the question that needs to be answered is: "Is the war on terrorism turning out to be a curse disguised as a blessing?"
We all like freedom. Freedom to express ourselves, freedom to gather in political associations - but we do so respectfully, even towards opponents...
Why can't some countries come to terms with the ideals of democracy and start abiding by the centuries old concepts of separation between democratic institutions. Once lawmakers also become judges and rulers in the sense of threading on their populations, much is lost.
That is, perhaps, the backside of the coin. We are fighting a good fight, but some play with a hidden deck of cards - and a totally opposite agenda... Why are so many silent towards this?
That is the best question ever, I should think.
If everyone agreed terrorism was wrong, there would be no opposition.
But there is opposition, and the question that needs to be answered is: "Is the war on terrorism turning out to be a curse disguised as a blessing?"
We all like freedom. Freedom to express ourselves, freedom to gather in political associations - but we do so respectfully, even towards opponents...
Why can't some countries come to terms with the ideals of democracy and start abiding by the centuries old concepts of separation between democratic institutions. Once lawmakers also become judges and rulers in the sense of threading on their populations, much is lost.
That is, perhaps, the backside of the coin. We are fighting a good fight, but some play with a hidden deck of cards - and a totally opposite agenda... Why are so many silent towards this?
That is the best question ever, I should think.
Saturday, July 2, 2011
Gaddafi - Stronger Than Many Anticipated
Gaddafi, dictator for decades in Libya, was indeed stronger than many anticipated. When we entered the crisis from a NATO and UN perspective it was thought he would be defeated within only a few weeks.
Something very different has happened - and world leaders are hopelessly silent about what is actually taking place.
While Gaddafi uses a lot of talk about his version of pride, the world is wondering: "Why don't we just take that FINAL military decision?"
How can such a dictator survive armed forces from so many nations for such a long time? What is holding us back from finally taking out his entire armed forces? The crisis about to ensue in the Middle East is going to be VERY dramatic if this farce is allowed to continue.
I personally find it laughable when a wimp such as Gaddafi hides behind his minions and begins threatening of bombing Europe. But I find it even more strange that our world alliance lacks the balls to actually move ahead and finally get that final blow that will show we mean business.
Dictators are just as much terrorists as was Osama Bin Laden, and if we want a safe place for our kids and grandkids it might be the right time to STOP the aggression of religious nonsense. If there is such a big animosity between people, then let's get that final thing over and done with.
None of us want that, but there is a time to count the cost, and wimping out from threats is considered cowardice by people with so different an ideology as Gaddafi.
So I would suggest military and political leaders get their perspectives right, and begin finalizing what they started before everything gets out of hand because of half-willed people who fail to finish what was begun.
Something very different has happened - and world leaders are hopelessly silent about what is actually taking place.
While Gaddafi uses a lot of talk about his version of pride, the world is wondering: "Why don't we just take that FINAL military decision?"
How can such a dictator survive armed forces from so many nations for such a long time? What is holding us back from finally taking out his entire armed forces? The crisis about to ensue in the Middle East is going to be VERY dramatic if this farce is allowed to continue.
I personally find it laughable when a wimp such as Gaddafi hides behind his minions and begins threatening of bombing Europe. But I find it even more strange that our world alliance lacks the balls to actually move ahead and finally get that final blow that will show we mean business.
Dictators are just as much terrorists as was Osama Bin Laden, and if we want a safe place for our kids and grandkids it might be the right time to STOP the aggression of religious nonsense. If there is such a big animosity between people, then let's get that final thing over and done with.
None of us want that, but there is a time to count the cost, and wimping out from threats is considered cowardice by people with so different an ideology as Gaddafi.
So I would suggest military and political leaders get their perspectives right, and begin finalizing what they started before everything gets out of hand because of half-willed people who fail to finish what was begun.
Friday, May 20, 2011
When a War Is Won
When a war is won you can't go back to pre-war lines of geometry. That lies at the core of war. When Israel was attacked in 1967 it defended itself against very dangerous and ill-willed people that wanted to throw them all totally out of the Middle East.
Obama has started a noble negotiation with both parties in the current crisis, but he does it from a failed perspective. Look around the Middle East, and take a long and hard look at the anatomy of the countries surrounding Israel. Many of these countries are highly aggressive against the Jewish state established in 1948.
I am saddened to see the many people who can't take an honest state against the anti-semitism shown towards Israel - and I must say it is highly positive to see that Sarah Palin is friendly towards Israel, a truly rare trait amidst political correctness where people deny their spiritual heritage.
Sorry, dear readers, but the current talks may be necessary to negotiate a treaty to halt the crisis, but it must be done from a correct historical perspective instead of continuing the debate from a purely naive view of the world. We see aggression all over the territory, and it requires a more complete analysis to create a lasting peace.
As I have said long ago we may need a situation similar to Cyprus. A line that is set, and then a clear understanding that aggression MUST be stopped. If that was said to both parties, the crisis would be over. But when one party continues to send rockets "over the fence" [pardon the pun... ;-)] it is no wonder that the other fights back.
Israel needs to be recognized instead of overlooked as it has been for far too long down through history. The chosen nation has a historic role to play, and that should be accepted - whether politically correct or not in the opinion of some...
Obama has started a noble negotiation with both parties in the current crisis, but he does it from a failed perspective. Look around the Middle East, and take a long and hard look at the anatomy of the countries surrounding Israel. Many of these countries are highly aggressive against the Jewish state established in 1948.
I am saddened to see the many people who can't take an honest state against the anti-semitism shown towards Israel - and I must say it is highly positive to see that Sarah Palin is friendly towards Israel, a truly rare trait amidst political correctness where people deny their spiritual heritage.
Sorry, dear readers, but the current talks may be necessary to negotiate a treaty to halt the crisis, but it must be done from a correct historical perspective instead of continuing the debate from a purely naive view of the world. We see aggression all over the territory, and it requires a more complete analysis to create a lasting peace.
As I have said long ago we may need a situation similar to Cyprus. A line that is set, and then a clear understanding that aggression MUST be stopped. If that was said to both parties, the crisis would be over. But when one party continues to send rockets "over the fence" [pardon the pun... ;-)] it is no wonder that the other fights back.
Israel needs to be recognized instead of overlooked as it has been for far too long down through history. The chosen nation has a historic role to play, and that should be accepted - whether politically correct or not in the opinion of some...
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
Sarah Palin Running for Office in 2012?
I am wondering, as many others, whether Sarah Palin will be running for the Presidency in 2012. Regardless of your political stand you must admit that she deserves praise for stating her opinions in clear words.
She delivers on her promises and is highly praised in Alaska. She definitely looks better than Obama with his fluffy promises that he couldn't keep - and ultimately news that Donald Trump wouldn't be running for office has certainly helped her chances of becoming the Republican candidate for the presidency in 2012.
What are your thoughts on the coming elections?
She delivers on her promises and is highly praised in Alaska. She definitely looks better than Obama with his fluffy promises that he couldn't keep - and ultimately news that Donald Trump wouldn't be running for office has certainly helped her chances of becoming the Republican candidate for the presidency in 2012.
What are your thoughts on the coming elections?
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
An Unarmed Osama - No Excuse!
The rumor that Osama was unarmed when he was killed by Navy Seals is no surprise. Apparently, Osama had numerous people on his payroll who protected him to such an extent that he was able to live in Pakistan under anonymous "protection"... Yet, he felt unsure about his own people, because he surrounded himself with bodyguards who WERE armed when the attack was made.
Let's recap the situation. Osama bin Laden was a terrorist. He killed thousands of people as the leader of al Quaeda, and why should it be any excuse that he lived luxuriously and left protection to others?
You could even ask the, somewhat fair, question: Was Obama such a person that he couldn't handle weapons himself, but had to rely on the power of the tongue to instigate others to do the killings for him?
Was Obama, in reality, a coward?
He hid for a decade - and was well aware that a reward on him of 100,000,000$ dead or alive was made long ago.
The idea that he could somehow be a martyr is strange indeed - but no surprise to those of us who are more convinced than ever before that the mixture of politics and religion is a deadly cocktail. Such a blend kills any normal thinking when idolized people begin shooting east and west as Osama instigated. His terrorist network has been guilty of terrorist attacks in numerous locations, and stopping him is no doubt only the first step. Anyone who steps in as a new leader in that terrorist network can expect to end their days in exactly the same way, and rightly so.
Osama is no martyr. He was a hateful man who used his money in the wrong way - to kill others. If Osama bin Laden had half the brains of a man like Bill Gates, he would have used his fortune to BUILD UP others and HELP people rather than destroy them.
Let's recap the situation. Osama bin Laden was a terrorist. He killed thousands of people as the leader of al Quaeda, and why should it be any excuse that he lived luxuriously and left protection to others?
You could even ask the, somewhat fair, question: Was Obama such a person that he couldn't handle weapons himself, but had to rely on the power of the tongue to instigate others to do the killings for him?
Was Obama, in reality, a coward?
He hid for a decade - and was well aware that a reward on him of 100,000,000$ dead or alive was made long ago.
The idea that he could somehow be a martyr is strange indeed - but no surprise to those of us who are more convinced than ever before that the mixture of politics and religion is a deadly cocktail. Such a blend kills any normal thinking when idolized people begin shooting east and west as Osama instigated. His terrorist network has been guilty of terrorist attacks in numerous locations, and stopping him is no doubt only the first step. Anyone who steps in as a new leader in that terrorist network can expect to end their days in exactly the same way, and rightly so.
Osama is no martyr. He was a hateful man who used his money in the wrong way - to kill others. If Osama bin Laden had half the brains of a man like Bill Gates, he would have used his fortune to BUILD UP others and HELP people rather than destroy them.
Sunday, March 20, 2011
Gaddafi Militarizes His People
Libyas leader, Gaddafi, is currently giving weapons to his people - a very dangerous move for the people of Libya. Now, they will be moving from civilian status into military personnel.
That is a very special situation, which must be taken into account when you hear news about bombings in Libya.
Civilians have a unique protection according to the laws of war - and rules of engagement. But Gaddafi has now REMOVED that protection by arming his people. So not only has he ruthlessly attacked what he defines as rebels, but now he even moves ahead to destroy even more people by involving them because of his own mental instability.
What a strange behavior indeed...
That is a very special situation, which must be taken into account when you hear news about bombings in Libya.
Civilians have a unique protection according to the laws of war - and rules of engagement. But Gaddafi has now REMOVED that protection by arming his people. So not only has he ruthlessly attacked what he defines as rebels, but now he even moves ahead to destroy even more people by involving them because of his own mental instability.
What a strange behavior indeed...
Saturday, March 19, 2011
Dare We Disagree?
Do we dare to disagree? Can we actually accept one another - even when we do disagree on certain subjects? This could be anything from being a Republican or a Democrat to whether you agree on our sanctioning a no-flight zone over Libya...
Everyone has great empathy for a people being attacked by their own leader. But how did the world react when China smashed students at Tiananmen at the end of the 1980's? Why were we passive when the Philippines had a dictator of their own who gladly spent thousands of dollars on shoes for his wife, Imelda Marcos, while people went hungry? What did we do in all the other situations where we COULD have done something, but didn't?
Those questions are less popular to ask. Simply because the implication is that you are defending someone just because you dare to QUESTION what takes place.
Shouldn't we all dare to think for ourselves? Shouldn't we be allowed to have our own opinions, even on subjects where the majority just go with the wind?
Anyone with democratic values should be able to realize that we need to think outside the box if we want to SOLVE problems rather than create new ones by taking short-term decisions most of the time.
Do we dare disagree? Please leave a comment, and let's have a debate about our right to disagree... Thanks very much beforehand. :-)
Everyone has great empathy for a people being attacked by their own leader. But how did the world react when China smashed students at Tiananmen at the end of the 1980's? Why were we passive when the Philippines had a dictator of their own who gladly spent thousands of dollars on shoes for his wife, Imelda Marcos, while people went hungry? What did we do in all the other situations where we COULD have done something, but didn't?
Those questions are less popular to ask. Simply because the implication is that you are defending someone just because you dare to QUESTION what takes place.
Shouldn't we all dare to think for ourselves? Shouldn't we be allowed to have our own opinions, even on subjects where the majority just go with the wind?
Anyone with democratic values should be able to realize that we need to think outside the box if we want to SOLVE problems rather than create new ones by taking short-term decisions most of the time.
Do we dare disagree? Please leave a comment, and let's have a debate about our right to disagree... Thanks very much beforehand. :-)
Tuesday, March 15, 2011
The Tragedy in Japan
Why does it take a nuclear meltdown of one of the energy turbines before Europeans begin taking notice of security issues of their sometimes up to thirty year old energy plants?
The tragedy in Japan may instigate a much more thourough analysis in other countries, and that can be beneficial for all - but why do we need a tragedy before we realize just how potentially dangerous nuclear energy CAN be?
For numerous years scientists have debated just how safe nuclear energy actually was, when waste products were treated correctly. It all sounded very good, but after the tragedy in Japan the question come to mind: were we all cheated into slumbering?
Please comment, and let's have a debate about nuclear energy. :-)
The tragedy in Japan may instigate a much more thourough analysis in other countries, and that can be beneficial for all - but why do we need a tragedy before we realize just how potentially dangerous nuclear energy CAN be?
For numerous years scientists have debated just how safe nuclear energy actually was, when waste products were treated correctly. It all sounded very good, but after the tragedy in Japan the question come to mind: were we all cheated into slumbering?
Please comment, and let's have a debate about nuclear energy. :-)
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
Libya - Gadaffi - Al Qaeda etc
Libya's leader Gadaffi is blaming Al Qaeda for his current crisis - and his soldiers blame rebels as drug-abusers. What a chaos in a country that suddenly smelled freedom when Egypt was freed from the reign of Mubarak.
As in so many other poor nations, the sudden feeling of freedom can really ignite their inner longings. Much like the west propably was also fiered up and zealous just centuries ago when what we today know as the US was established...
The main difference being religion, but the longing for democracy just as identical - regardless of religion. :-)
What happens in that region in coming months is truly going to determine how things will boil up. Noone needs any political degree to smell blood. Truly a scary scenario to behold.
What are your thoughts? Please leave a comment, and let's have a good debate.
As in so many other poor nations, the sudden feeling of freedom can really ignite their inner longings. Much like the west propably was also fiered up and zealous just centuries ago when what we today know as the US was established...
The main difference being religion, but the longing for democracy just as identical - regardless of religion. :-)
What happens in that region in coming months is truly going to determine how things will boil up. Noone needs any political degree to smell blood. Truly a scary scenario to behold.
What are your thoughts? Please leave a comment, and let's have a good debate.
Sunday, February 20, 2011
"Four More Years"?
The question about whether President Obama will be a one-term President is going to be revealed once the Republicans will have elected whom they want to run for office. New times didn't quite happen when Obama came into office. Bad scenarios have popped up all around him, and it doesn't take much to consider how a serious Republican candidate COULD win back the office after some pretty awful years under Bush.
It isn't a question about whether Obama made an effort. Everyone realizes he did his best. It would have been stupid to do anything less, because everyone knows a President will be evaluated very harshly by voters when considering four more years.
Everyone considered it was an act of kindness to choose Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State, but the choice didn't quite have the effect they would have anticipated. Bill Clinton may be remembered more fondly after he left office, but the whims of Hillary as hidden puppet master seems to be apparent once again - and her chances as a candidate in 2016 are slim at best.
Republicans are free to choose whom they want, but a very strong guess is that Republicans will choose the safe candidate. A candidate that could "prove" even women could enter office, and letting Sarah Palin from Alaska run would be a wise choice. Even if she fails, the Reoublican party could always claim it was because Afro-American Barack Obama was a popular President who, quite naturally, won his second term.
In other words: it would be too dangerous to let Mrs. Palin take on the role of martyr when the Old Boy Network didn't accept her during the 2012 since it would create an even greater expectation for a female President.
In a time when equality should have been natural long ago, sexes are once again important. The power of religion is strong, and no president can ever afford to overlook the strong Bible Belt voters. The Republicans know this because it has been at the centre of their focus every time they have won the office.
So interesting times indeed. :-)
It isn't a question about whether Obama made an effort. Everyone realizes he did his best. It would have been stupid to do anything less, because everyone knows a President will be evaluated very harshly by voters when considering four more years.
Everyone considered it was an act of kindness to choose Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State, but the choice didn't quite have the effect they would have anticipated. Bill Clinton may be remembered more fondly after he left office, but the whims of Hillary as hidden puppet master seems to be apparent once again - and her chances as a candidate in 2016 are slim at best.
Republicans are free to choose whom they want, but a very strong guess is that Republicans will choose the safe candidate. A candidate that could "prove" even women could enter office, and letting Sarah Palin from Alaska run would be a wise choice. Even if she fails, the Reoublican party could always claim it was because Afro-American Barack Obama was a popular President who, quite naturally, won his second term.
In other words: it would be too dangerous to let Mrs. Palin take on the role of martyr when the Old Boy Network didn't accept her during the 2012 since it would create an even greater expectation for a female President.
In a time when equality should have been natural long ago, sexes are once again important. The power of religion is strong, and no president can ever afford to overlook the strong Bible Belt voters. The Republicans know this because it has been at the centre of their focus every time they have won the office.
So interesting times indeed. :-)
Wednesday, February 16, 2011
Egypt - A Country in Despair
It is truly tragic to hear of the assaults on journalists that have happened when people tried to get rid of Hosni Mubarak. What a sad testimony to leave behind in a fight for democracy that people can't respect the role of mass media as part of the process...
How can anyone expect Egypt to rise above dictatorships when the population itself understands so little about what democracy is all about?
Egypt is a country in despair. People will wait long before enjoying their next vacation in that country when people have been so abusive during the crisis as to even sexually molest a CBS journalist.
So winning in the sense of getting rid of Hosni Mubarak was one thing. They have lost much respect among civilized people, and those scars will take long to heal.
What are your thoughts about Egypt? You're welcome to leave a comment. :-)
How can anyone expect Egypt to rise above dictatorships when the population itself understands so little about what democracy is all about?
Egypt is a country in despair. People will wait long before enjoying their next vacation in that country when people have been so abusive during the crisis as to even sexually molest a CBS journalist.
So winning in the sense of getting rid of Hosni Mubarak was one thing. They have lost much respect among civilized people, and those scars will take long to heal.
What are your thoughts about Egypt? You're welcome to leave a comment. :-)
Friday, January 28, 2011
Important Decision to Be Made in France
In France, an important decision is facing politicians. Will they follow the 58% of the population who support gays' rights to join in marriage, or will intolerance be the order of the day for a society that claims it never discriminates based on religion?
When it came to the question of christian crosses or jewish kippas or muslim veils, it was claimed that no discrimination happened since all religious signs were forbidden in schools etc.
But what could possibly be the reason for forbidding two people to join in marriage just because they chose to join with a partner of the same sex, if not due to religion?
Politics should never be based upon personal preference but should follow the international guidelines against discrimination. Therefore, the French politicians face a tough decision if they fail to comply with international standards. Will France remain a secular society or will policy-making be based on Catholic standards?
And, if so, have they even considered the implications once religion is mixed with politics? Dangerous ground indeed...
When it came to the question of christian crosses or jewish kippas or muslim veils, it was claimed that no discrimination happened since all religious signs were forbidden in schools etc.
But what could possibly be the reason for forbidding two people to join in marriage just because they chose to join with a partner of the same sex, if not due to religion?
Politics should never be based upon personal preference but should follow the international guidelines against discrimination. Therefore, the French politicians face a tough decision if they fail to comply with international standards. Will France remain a secular society or will policy-making be based on Catholic standards?
And, if so, have they even considered the implications once religion is mixed with politics? Dangerous ground indeed...
Political Blogging - Ethics of Making Money From Your Blog
Political Blogging - Ethics of Making Money From Your Blog
By Henrik V Blunck
Blogging about politics can be tough business. Many may drop away from your blog because they disagree with you. On the other hand you will attract very little attention if you stay away from having an opinion about the subjects you blog about.
People have easy access to information about what happens - all over the globe. What they get much less of from traditional sources are analyses and behind-the-scenes impressions about what happens. That creates a duality when you blog about political subjects.
You will have to realize, from the beginning, that politics and religion are the two areas where you will never agree with everyone.
When that has been said, it is also important to say that you can be biased in your analysis without pushing other people aside. Doing that in the best way when running a political blog involves presenting both sides of the equation, and using careful evaluation to show why you have the opinion you do - and how it affects other people.
When you use that type of debate, people may disagree with some of your conclusion, but they will nonetheless respect you for standing by your opinion. When you analyze things from a respectful perspective you show empathy for other people's views while also giving them food for thought.
It's What People Want - Food For Thought
This is the single most lacking ingredient in most political blogging. People are so focused on writing about high profile subjects, and matching certain key words that they totally forget their audiences. This is the one area where you can truly make a difference if you want to do a decent job in blogging about politics.
I know from personal experience that this type of blogging has a tremendous potential. I have seen my blog rise in power and visitor counts within days after writing on an important subject. I did this in danish, but you can have the same experience in any language. The important part is to realize what your assignment is, and after you know that, you can increase your readership considerably by choosing carefully reviewed opinions at all times. You may also have an undecided opinion, and that would be an excellent chance to call in further opinions using feedback from readers.
But don't ever get discouraged by worrying about where you earn your money when blogging. You are never ethically challenged as long as you handle all subjects to the best of your ability.
Thanks for reading this article. Hope you enjoyed the information.
You can see my overview of blogs over at http://blunckmeister.googlepages.com.You can follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/henrikblunck Feel free to leave feedback if you were helped by this article. I am always happy to hear what YOU think.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Henrik_V_Blunck
http://EzineArticles.com/?Political-Blogging---Ethics-of-Making-Money-From-Your-Blog&id=4267010
By Henrik V Blunck
Blogging about politics can be tough business. Many may drop away from your blog because they disagree with you. On the other hand you will attract very little attention if you stay away from having an opinion about the subjects you blog about.
People have easy access to information about what happens - all over the globe. What they get much less of from traditional sources are analyses and behind-the-scenes impressions about what happens. That creates a duality when you blog about political subjects.
- On the one hand you want to stay objective - to remain credible
- But you also want to have a twist - to differentiate yourself from the crowd
You will have to realize, from the beginning, that politics and religion are the two areas where you will never agree with everyone.
When that has been said, it is also important to say that you can be biased in your analysis without pushing other people aside. Doing that in the best way when running a political blog involves presenting both sides of the equation, and using careful evaluation to show why you have the opinion you do - and how it affects other people.
When you use that type of debate, people may disagree with some of your conclusion, but they will nonetheless respect you for standing by your opinion. When you analyze things from a respectful perspective you show empathy for other people's views while also giving them food for thought.
It's What People Want - Food For Thought
This is the single most lacking ingredient in most political blogging. People are so focused on writing about high profile subjects, and matching certain key words that they totally forget their audiences. This is the one area where you can truly make a difference if you want to do a decent job in blogging about politics.
I know from personal experience that this type of blogging has a tremendous potential. I have seen my blog rise in power and visitor counts within days after writing on an important subject. I did this in danish, but you can have the same experience in any language. The important part is to realize what your assignment is, and after you know that, you can increase your readership considerably by choosing carefully reviewed opinions at all times. You may also have an undecided opinion, and that would be an excellent chance to call in further opinions using feedback from readers.
But don't ever get discouraged by worrying about where you earn your money when blogging. You are never ethically challenged as long as you handle all subjects to the best of your ability.
Thanks for reading this article. Hope you enjoyed the information.
You can see my overview of blogs over at http://blunckmeister.googlepages.com.You can follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/henrikblunck Feel free to leave feedback if you were helped by this article. I am always happy to hear what YOU think.
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Henrik_V_Blunck
http://EzineArticles.com/?Political-Blogging---Ethics-of-Making-Money-From-Your-Blog&id=4267010
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
